Marriage Equality: A Movement for Equality and Justice for All
As a gay Asian American, I cannot think about marriage equality without also thinking about my parents, who, through a near impossible marriage, immigrated to the States and worked tirelessly as garment and restaurant workers to raise me and my two siblings. They raised us to be talented artists and mathematicians, always humble, and always aware of our heritage. We are the biggest reason why they continue to work hard. They want me to have a family and share the same joys they get from us. Unfortunately, the fight against marriage equality threatens to keep me and those in my community from marrying who we love. For this reason, and given that LGBTQ couples face the same barriers that have historically denied API’s the right to marry, marriage equality should be considered a fundamental right. The legacy of racial injustice against API’s and the injustices caused by marriage inequality provides our community with the imperative to form coalitions in order to not only legalize marriage equality, but to form a movement for equality and justice for all.
Just as Brown v. Board of Education ruled that separate schools for separate racial groups is racial discrimination, marriage inequality is sexual discrimination.[i] Marriage allows couples to show their commitment to each other to their loved ones, security for building a family, and importantly, acceptance into society. Invariably, denying us that right denies us from being seen as equal citizens of this country. I believe that obtaining marriage equality is but one step to a greater vision of social justice, but in order for the movement to begin, we must first rearticulate the consciousness of our own community and to do so is to illuminate past injustices toward API’s in parallel to the discourse of marriage equality today.
The 1875 Page Act prevented Japanese and Chinese women from immigrating.[ii] The 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act critically curtailed the number of Chinese families settling in the States.[iii] As a result of anti-miscegenation laws and migratory contract labor, many Filipinos died as bachelors.[iv] In short, while API’s were seen as “useful” for their labor, they were not deemed worthy of integration. Before Loving v. Virginia struck down anti-miscegenation in 1967, legal discourse believed that API’s who intermarried with whites were un-Godly, unnatural, and created unhealthy children. The same “reasons” ring true today to justify marriage inequality.[v] bell hooks puts it best, “until we are able to accept the interlocking, interdependent nature of systems of domination and recognize specific ways each system is maintained, we will continue to act in ways that undermine our individual quest for freedom...” [vi]
Those who advocate for marriage “protection” place emphasis on maintaining healthy children, but the consequences of not humanizing, and normalizing various sexualities leads to the detriment of those we all care about the most. This April, two 11-year-old boys, Carl Walker-Hoover and Jakeem Herrera hanged themselves because of homophobic bullying at school. [vii] Thus, marriage equality is not merely about who should or should not be married but it invariably speaks to a vision of greater societal tolerance. hooks writes, “the capacity for empathy needed for the building of community is diminished when we think of ‘us/them.’” Not only are children harmed, but loving couples and families are torn apart. Asian American historian, Helen Zia, said, “Marriage…is a bonding of two families…My mother’s inability to say that [I am] married prevents her from sharing … the pride and joy…that she would have if [my] union [was] recognized as a marriage by society.”[viii]
My parents married because they were lucky. They fell in love but my grandfather did not approve of my father and forced him to sign a contract agreeing that he would never come near my mother again. Soon after, my mother left for America and my father forced himself to forget her. My mother, however, in her new home in Sacramento, could not forget the man she loved. A family friend noticed that she was upset and asked if she had a boyfriend. My mother said, "Even if I did, why does it matter?" It was this family friend who convinced my grandfather to allow the marriage. After one year, my mother flew back to China and married my father... and the rest is history. But what if the contract my father signed stood? What if my grandfather was America and my father was me seeking to marry my partner? The joy they share today would be nonexistent. The joy they share today would not exist. But my parents have come a long way since immigrating, when they did piecework and washed dishes to make ends meet and used a cardboard box as a dinner table in a one bed-room apartment. They have built a home and raised a family who mean the world to them. Without marriage equality my community may never experience the joy that my parents worked so hard to achieve—for them, and for us.
Indeed, it is a tough journey to marriage equality, but there is progress. Despite legal uncertainty, thousands of couples have gotten married. Organizations like API PFLAG continue to provide support. This month, a private bill introduced by Senator Feinstein and Representative Speier allowed an undocumented Pilipino woman to stay with her U.S-citizen partner in the States.[ix] With that, the Asian American community needs to work toward justice both incrementally and through social movements, as we are children of both struggles. Building coalitions to support bills like the Uniting American Families Act is crucial.[x]
Yes, there needs to be legal recognition of marriage equality, but more importantly, is the shift in the consciousness of our community that is in solidarity with the struggles of the LGBTQ community. We need to recognize that society is using the same powers that have historically divided us, to deny LGBTQ couples the right to love. In the words of Audre Lorde, “The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.”[xi] This allows our community to bring about mass cultural consciousness toward a more tolerant, just society. Indeed, it is already happening.
[i] This is a landmark legislation that struck down Plessy v. Ferguson, which ruled that racial segregation in public accommodations is constitutional. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. No. 347 U.S. 483. United States Supreme Court. 17 May 1954.
[ii] The Page Law was the first piece of U.S. legislation to exclude a group from immigrating. The purpose of the Act was to curtail the prominence of prostitution and was theoretically gender-neutral, but Chinese women were primarily affected. Lee, E. 2007. At America's Gates Chinese Immigration during the Exclusion Era, 1882-1943. New York: The University of North Carolina Press, 30-31.
[iii] Most of the early Chinese immigrants were able-bodied men. Because it was tougher for women to come overseas coupled with anti-miscegenation laws, many Chinese men could not have families. Lee, E. 2007. At America's Gates Chinese Immigration during the Exclusion Era, 1882-1943. New York: The University of North Carolina Press, 30-31, 117-119.
[iv] The Farmworker’s Website, “The Struggle in California,” http://www.farmworkers.org/strugcal.html
[v] Loving v. Virginia. No. 388 U.S. 1. United States Supreme Court. 1967.
Yang, B. 2006. Seeing Loving in Gay Marriages: Parallels of Asian American History and the Same-Sex Marriage
Debates Amerasia Journal 32 (1): 35.
Herring, G. 1998. The Beguiled: Misogynist myth or feminist fable? Literature Film Quarterly 26 (3): 214-219.
[vi] hooks, b. 1994. Outlaw Culture: Resisting Representations. New York: Routledge, 244.
[vii] On April 24, 2009, two 11-year-old boys of color, Carl Walker-Hoover and Jakeem Herrera hanged themselves because of homophobic bullying at school. Blow, Charles M. “Two Little Boys.” New York Times, April 24, 2009, http://blow.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/24/two-little-boys/
[viii] Asian Pacific American Legal Center, Unprecedented Coalition of Over 60 Asian American Organizations File
Legal Brief Supporting Equal Marriage Rights in California (Press release, Los Angeles, CA. 26 Sept. 2007).
[ix] Asian Pacific American Legal Center, APALC Applauds Senator Feinstein's Assistance on behalf of Asian
American Same-Sex Couple (Press release, Los Angeles, California. 24 Apr. 2009).
[x] If passed, this bill will allow U.S. citizens to sponsor their same-sex partners from other countries. Uniting American Families Act, H.R. 1024, 111th Cong.
[xi] Lorde, A. 2007. The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House. In Sister Outsider Essays and Speeches (Crossing Press Feminist Series), New York: Crossing Press.
Private Lives
5 hours ago



















